| User comments »
|
 |
metallica 666 :
man, nice guitar, but your tone is horrible POSTED: 01/11/2010 - 03:14 pm / quote |
deafening :
tone was not so nice i agree, but the lesson was very good for those unfamiliar with diminished and its a lesson so tone isn't something i even look at haha.
Sick lesson man! POSTED: 01/11/2010 - 03:47 pm / quote |
ticklemeemo :
Really good lesson, I love playing with the diminished scale.
His tone isn't so bad that it distracts from the lesson, come on guys. POSTED: 01/11/2010 - 05:15 pm / quote |
eetfuk58 :
hm.
well he knows his theory but sucks at guitar. POSTED: 01/12/2010 - 01:17 am / quote |
SwollenEyeballs :
Sweet! i hadn't actually learned what makes something diminished... this helped a lot. [= POSTED: 01/12/2010 - 01:39 am / quote |
jaypauljackson :
probaly poor sounding tone due to x lite strings and use of distortion. good lession on dim. apreggios. POSTED: 01/12/2010 - 01:49 pm / quote |
devilex121 :
good lesson... i now understand my theory  POSTED: 01/13/2010 - 07:19 am / quote |
Swannie :
Why won't it play? POSTED: 01/14/2010 - 04:43 pm / quote |
SwanSong70 :
Maybe Aaron didn't want his tone to out-shine what it was that he wanted to teach. Anyway . . . it was a well thought out lesson with a lot of useful examples. Mastering this lesson would be good for impressing your friends, but it's not very useful for everyday songwriting usefulness (unless you're Yngwie Malmsteen=) POSTED: 01/15/2010 - 08:41 am / quote |
SwanSong70 :
The tone was good enough for me to hear what he was playing, and it's a good lesson that teaches a good warm-up exercise. POSTED: 01/15/2010 - 09:16 am / quote |
mumbles36 :
ticklemeemo wrote:
Really good lesson, I love playing with the diminished scale.
His tone isn't so bad that it distracts from the lesson, come on guys. |
I agree POSTED: 01/16/2010 - 10:19 am / quote |
stingray104 :
Using the enharmonic names of the notes he's correct that there are only three diminished chords kind of, but thats a horrible way to look at it. Its all about context because c, e-flat, g-flat, and b-double flat isn't always a diminished chord in the key you are playing. Its a fully diminished vii7 in the key of D-flat (major in case you don't know that capital letters are major) which is a borrowed chord from the theoretical key of d-flat harmonic minor because in major you have a half-diminished vii7. And if he calls it a c fully-diminished 7 he can't change the b-double flat to an a. Though it is the same pitch enharmonically it alters the name of the chord. If you have a, c, e-flat, g-flat, now you have an a fully- diminished 7. Which isn't in his list of the three diminished chords you have. a fully- diminished 7 would be the diminished vii for the key of b-flat or borrowed from that key for the key of B-flat. You see its all about context. Thats why the way this guy is teaching the theory this way is misleading. He's trying to give you a shortcut but you can't really cut corners in music. It only hurts in the long run. POSTED: 01/18/2010 - 11:53 am / quote |
garyb :
stingray104 wrote:
Using the enharmonic names...It's all about context...you can't really cut corners in music |
Stingray - Excellent point...I totally agree.
Aaron - You have good presence as a demonstrator, but may I suggest you redo the vid to accommodate Stingrays points, and also back of the distortion (turn the vol down a little), and slow down your speech/delivery rate? Keep at it dude, you're getting there!
g. POSTED: 01/25/2010 - 09:15 am / quote |
|